Global Solar has developed a proprietary process for manufacturing thin-film
Copper Indium Gallium diSelenide (CIGS) photovoltaic (PV) modules.
Unlike traditional solar panels that are rigid, heavy and fragile,
Global Solar's thin-film solar modules are lightweight, flexible
and durable. While other companies produce CIGS on glass, Global
Solar is the only company with CIGS on flexible materials.
CIGS create more electricity from the same amount of sunlight than
does other thin-film PV and therefore has a higher "conversion
efficiency". CIGS conversion efficiency is also very stable over
time, meaning its performance continues unabated for many years.
The performance of many other PV materials can rapidly decline
with use. Customers are well aware that Global Solar's CIGS does
not suffer the degradation in cell efficiency associated with other
thin-film PV. (See conclusions of Israel's Weizmann Institute as
published in Renewable Energy World, September 1999, "CIGS
Cells are Self-Repairing, Say Researchers").
No other company comes close to matching our approach to PV manufacturing
and its resultant PV products.
This is because:
- Global Solar uses thin-film PV which is less expensive
to manufacture due to reduced labor, lower material,
energy, handling and capital costs.
- Global
Solar
uses
Copper
Indium
Gallium
diSelenide
(CIGS)
which
is
the
best
of
the
thin-film
PV.
- Global
Solar
uses "roll-roll" manufacturing
which
is
significantly
more
cost-effective
than
traditional
in-line
manufacturing
approaches.
- Global
Solar's
PV
can
be
shipped
in
very
compact,
lightweight
packages
to
the
most
remote
parts
of
the
earth.
This
significantly
reduces
the
cost
of
the
complete
installation.
- Global
Solar's
PV
being
so
compact
provides
better
storage
and
when
coupled
with
high
damage
tolerance
is
a
significant
advantage
for
many
military,
space,
and
commercial
applications.
|
Global Solar's technology and products offer
great opportunity to the future of renewable energy.
PHOTOVOLTAICS
How it works
Photovoltaics (PV) systems produce
electricity when exposed
to sunlight. Sunlight is
composed of particles of
energy called photons.
When sunlight strikes a
PV material, photons will
either pass through, be
reflected, or be absorbed.
If the photon is absorbed,
its energy will be transferred
to an electron in an atom
of the PV material. With
its new found energy, the
electron is able to escape
from its normal position
in orbit around that atom.
In this way, the electron
can become part of, and
augment, the current in
an electrical circuit.
This "photovoltaic effect" is
the basic physical process
through which sunlight
is converted into electricity.
The primary building block of a PV system is the PV cell. A typical
PV cell is about 3 X 3-in. and very thin. By itself, a single PV
cell produces only a small amount of electricity. Fortunately,
we can easily increase the total power in a PV system by connecting
several cells to form larger units called modules. Modules, in
turn, can be connected to form even larger units know as arrays,
which can be interconnected to produce more power, and so on. In
this way, we can build a PV system to meet almost any power need,
no matter how small or great.
CRYSTALLINE
SILICON
All commercially viable PV products are made using one of two groups
of technologies; Crystalline Silicon or Thin-film materials.
Crystalline Silicon
- Overview
Traditional crystalline silicon is by far the most common solar
cell material for commercial applications because:
- It has been
in use for
more than 50
years, and
its manufacturing
processes are
well known.
Those processes
are now largely
in the public
domain.
- The raw material
used, silicon,
is very abundant
(it's the second
most abundant
element in
the Earth's
crust - second
only to oxygen)
|
Although raw silicon is
readily available, the
silicon used in solar cells
must be refined to an extremely
high purity (99.9999 percent)
- far more refined than
most prescription medicines.
Refining to this degree
makes the silicon quite
expensive. In the past,
silicon PV producers economized
by reclaiming silicon waste
from Integrated Circuit
(IC) manufacturers (IC
chips require even higher
silicon purity). This source
is rapidly becoming less
available as IC producers
(1) improve their manufacturing
yields and thereby reduce
waste; (2) reclaim silicon
waste for their own uses;
and (3) develop chip designs
that can employ lower grade
silicon. As a result, PV
grade silicon is becoming
even more expensive.
Forms of Crystalline Silicon PV
There are two basic forms of crystalline silicon PV:
- Single-crystalline silicon, which is more efficient
at creating electricity from sunlight but is more expensive
to manufacture
- Poly-crystalline
silicon,
which
is
less
efficient
at
creating
electricity
from
sunlight,
but
is
less
expensive
to
manufacture.
|
As their name suggests, single-crystalline silicon cells are prepared
from slices of a large single crystal ingot. This crystalline material
is structurally uniform with very few disturbances in the orderly
arrangement of atoms. As a result, single-crystalline silicon is
more efficient at converting sunlight power into electricity. In
contrast, poly-crystalline silicon is composed of many crystals
or "grains". At the interfaces of the grains, the atomic order
is disrupted. These interfaces make poly-crystalline silicon less
efficient at converting sunlight power into electricity.
Crystalline silicon PV is made in several ways, all of which are
capital and labor intensive and require the costly melting of high-purity
silicon. The most widely used technique for making single-crystalline
silicon lowers a "seed" of single-crystalline silicon into the
top of a vat of molten silicon. As the seed is slowly raised from
the vat, atoms of the molten silicon solidify around the seed,
creating a long cylindrical ingot of silicon. All the crystals
within this ingot will have the same crystalline structure as the
seed. In contrast, semi-crystalline PV is typically made through
a much simpler process of casting, in which molten silicon is poured
directly into a mold and allowed to solidify into an ingot.
Either way, once the crystalline ingots are produced, they must
be sliced into very thin, fragile wafers. After several additional
manufacturing steps, wafers will work as PV cells; however, because
the cells are fragile, they usually must be encapsulated between
two thick sheets of glass. The glass allows sunlight to enter the
PV material while helping prevent damage from light impacts. Unfortunately,
the result is a very heavy, cumbersome product that cannot survive
serious impact, requires excessive protection during shipping,
and is costly to ship and handle.
Some PV manufacturers are pursuing new techniques to manufacture
crystalline silicon. In one such technique called Silicon-Film
approach, the silicon layer is grown directly on a ceramic substrate,
resulting in a silicon wafer that is reportedly one-half the thickness
of a traditional cell. In another technique, two parallel strings
are pulled through molten silicon which spans, then solidifies,
between the strings. Both processes eliminate the inherent cost
and waste of sawing an ingot of silicon into wafers. Nonetheless,
each approach still requires several additional manufacturing treatments
before these fragile wafers will work as PV cells. Moreover, the
resulting PV product still has most of the inherent limitations
of other silicon PV such as fragile cells and heavy packaging.
The characterization of either of these products as thin-film PV
is not supportable. Although the resultant silicon wafers may be
one-half the thickness of traditional silicon, they are, nonetheless,
50 times as thick as true thin-film PV.
THIN-FILM
Thin-Film - Overview
Like computer chips, PV devices are semi conductors. Accordingly,
many of the lessons learned developing computer technologies have
been applied to improving PV. One of the scientific discoveries
of the computer semiconductor industry that has shown great potential
for the PV industry is thin-film technology.
Rather than growing, slicing, and treating a crystalline ingot,
as with crystalline silicon, a PV material can be created by sequentially
depositing thin layers of the different materials into a very thin
structure. The resulting thin-film devices require very little
semiconductor material and have the added advantage of being easy
to manufacture.
Several different deposition techniques are available, and all
of them are potentially cheaper than the ingot-growth techniques
required for crystalline silicon. Best of all, these deposition
processes can be scaled up easily so that the same technique used
to make a 2-inch x 2-inch laboratory cell can be used to make a
2-foot x 5-foot module (in a sense, a huge cell!).
Thin-Film Forms
The three principal thin-film technologies are Amorphous Silicon
(a-Si), Cadmium Telluride (CdTe) and Copper Indium Gallium diSelenide
(CIGS).
Amorphous Silicon (a-Si)
Amorphous solids, like common glass, are materials in which the
atoms are not arranged in any particular order. They do not form
crystalline structures at all, and they contain large numbers of
structural and bonding defects.
In the '70s, researchers began to realize that amorphous silicon
could be used in PV devices by properly controlling the conditions
under which it was deposited and by carefully modifying its composition.
Similar to other thin-film PVs, amorphous silicon absorbs solar
radiation 40 times more efficiently than single-crystal silicon,
so a film only at 1 micron (one one-hundredth of a centimeter)
thick can absorb 90 percent of the usable solar energy. Today,
amorphous silicon is the predominant form of thin-film PV and is
commonly used for solar-powered consumer devices that have low
power requirements (e.g. wristwatches and calculators).
Limitations
Cell efficiency is an important measure of the performance of a
PV product. It defines how much energy in sunlight is actually
converted into electricity. A major drawback of amorphous silicon
modules is that they have lower efficiency than other PV materials.
Moreover, long-term, their cell efficiency degrades progressively
with use. This efficiency degradation is caused, ironically, by
exposure to light. To combat this phenomenon, manufacturers found
that by making the layers even thinner, degradation was not as
serious. Unfortunately, making the layers thinner also lowers the
product's overall cell efficiency.
Multi-junction
Thin-film PV is created by sequentially depositing thin layers
of the different materials into a very thin "sandwich-like" structure.
One way to improve cell efficiency that has been employed by amorphous
silicon manufacturers is to stack two of these PV "sandwiches" on
top of each other. The top sandwich will absorb some of the light
energy (photons) and create electricity. Any photons that pass
through the first sandwich can be absorbed by the second sandwich
to create additional electricity. Each of these sandwiches creates
a single electrical interface known as a "junction". Logically,
a stack of these junctions is referred to as a "multi-junction" cell.
Multi-junction devices can achieve higher total conversion efficiency
because they can convert more of the energy spectrum of light into
electricity.
Limitations
There is, of course, a downside to multi-junction PV devices. To
make these devices work, each sandwich has to be "tuned" to respond
to sunlight energy from a unique range of the solar spectrum (its
unique "band-gap"). In this way, the top cell captures the high-energy
photons and passes the rest of the photons on to be absorbed by
the bottom cell (or cells). The bottom cells also have to be tuned
to respond to lower band-gap energies. These multi-gap, multi-junction
designs have proven very costly to manufacture.
Other serious problems persist with amorphous silicon technology.
The best demonstrated laboratory module efficiency for single junction
amorphous silicon is much less than that of the CIGS technology.
Furthermore, triple-junction amorphous silicon designs still have
lower cell efficiency than a single-junction CIGS. Moreover, incremental
increases in cell efficiency have not occurred in the last several
years. Recent independent studies have also suggested that the
efficiency degradation of amorphous silicon is much more serious
than previously believed. (TISO Centre, and independent testing
laboratory funded by the Swiss Federal Office of Energy, has published
testing results at http://leee.dct.supsi.ch/pv/tiso_tests_results.htm).
Nonetheless, many companies continue to emphasize manufacturing
amorphous silicon because the technology is relatively well explored
and many of the patents have expired. Thus, most production techniques
are in the public domain.
Cadmium
Telluride (CdTe)
Cadmium Telluride, another thin-film technology, has high cell
efficiencies (over 16% in the laboratory). Manufactured module
efficiencies have been achieved and may increase to over 10% over
time. Limitations
CdTe exhibits certain limitations that may keep CdTe from full
market acceptance.
First, the perception has historically been that CdTe devices will
be unstable in the outdoor environment due to an inherent nature
of the material to "self-compensate", thereby causing degradation
of initially high-performance electronic contacts and reducing
power output over time.
Second, CdTe deposition and crystal formation requires high processing
temperatures. As a consequence of this and other issues, CdTe is
only manufactured in a "superstrate" configuration; that is, sunlight
must pass through the substrate to get to the PV material. Glass
is the only material that can withstand the temperature and still
be adequately transparent. Due to its fragile nature, the glass
used must necessarily be thick and heavy to endure the stresses
found during product life in the field. High processing conditions
can build stress into the glass, leading to fracturing after deployment.
A third limitation of CdTe is that the toxicity of Cadmium is of
concern to health officials and policy makers (Cadmium is a heavy
metal). This is expected to limit access to many high-volume consumer
applications.
Copper Indium Gallium diSelenide
(CIGS)
Copper Indium diSelenide (CuInSe2) has an extremely high absorption
that allows 99 percent of available light to be absorbed in the
first micron of the material. This makes it an optimal, effective
PV material. Adding small amounts of Gallium to the CuInSe2 boosts
its light-absorbing band gap, which makes it more closely match
the solar spectrum, thereby improving the voltage and the efficiency
of the PV cell. CIGS cells have reached efficiencies of more than
19 percent - much higher than other thin-film PV. CIGS also has
a demonstrated ability to pass appropriate environmental certification
and waste-handling requirements. (See Technology - Global
Solar)
Technology Comparison Summary
As the table below
summarizes, CIGS compares
favorably against the industry's
dominant technology, crystalline
silicon, as well as other
thin-film technologies.
This is especially true
when evaluating module
performance, since it is
modules, not cells that
ultimately are used in
the marketplace.
| Photovoltaic Technology |
Photovoltaic
Efficiency,
% |
Flexi-bility |
Remarks |
|
*Record
Cell |
*Record
Module |
Typical
Module |
| Crystalline
Silicon |
| Single Crystalline Silicon |
24.7 |
22.7 |
12-14 |
Rigid |
- Fully Mature
Technology
- Further
Reduction
in
Price
or
Increase
in
Performance
Difficult
|
| Polycrystalline Silicon |
20.3 |
15.3 |
10-12 |
Rigid |
- Similar to
Single Crystalline
Silicon
|
| String Ribbon Silicon |
16.6 |
8.2 |
|
Rigid |
- Similar to
Single Crystalline
Silicon
|
| Thin-Film |
| Amorphous Silicon |
12.7 |
N/A |
5-7 |
Rigid/ Some Flexible |
- Requires
Hazardous Gases
- Low
Performance
- No
Clear
Pathway
to
Increase
Efficiency
- Exhibits
Instability
|
| Multi-Junction Amorphous Silicon |
12.4 |
10.4 |
6-8 |
Rigid |
- Similar to
Amorphous Silicon
|
| Cadmium Telluride |
16.5 |
10.7 |
7-8 |
Rigid |
- Toxicity
of CdTe is
an Issue
- No
Clear
Pathway
to
Increase
Efficiency
- Requires
Superstrate
Configuration
|
| Copper Indium Gallium Diselenide |
19.2 |
13.4 |
9-11 |
Global Solar is Flexible |
- Economical
Material
and Processes
- Highest
Performance
Thin Film
- Clear
Pathways
to Improve
Performance
- Compatible
with Flexible
Substrates
and Economical
Roll-to-Roll
Processing
|
*Green MA,
Emery K, Ling DL, Igari
S, and Warta W. Solar Cell
Efficiency Tables (Version
24). Progress in Photovoltaics:
Research and Applications.
2004; 12: 365-372. |